WASHINGTON (AP) — A divided Supreme Court ruled Thursday that authorities do not have to provide a quick hearing when they seize cars and other property used in drug crimes, even when the property belongs to so-called innocent owners. By a 6-3 vote, the justices rejected the claims of two Alabama women who had to wait more than a year for their cars to be returned. Police had stopped the cars when they were being driven by other people and, after finding drugs, seized the vehicles. Civil forfeiture allows authorities to take someone’s property, without having to prove that it has been used for illicit purposes. Critics of the practice describe it as “legalized theft.” Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote for the conservative majority that a civil forfeiture hearing to determine whether an owner will lose the property permanently must be timely. But he said the Constitution does not also require a separate hearing about whether police may keep cars or other property in the meantime. |
South Carolina coach Dawn Staley gushes over congratulations from Queen BTip leads to arrest in cold case killing of offInside the $95B House package focused on aiding Ukraine, IsraelMel B continues to fuel Spice Girls reunion rumours as she teases a tour: 'It's going to happen'Canisius hires Penn State assistant Tiffany Swoffard to take over women's basketball programCedric Mullins hits 2NFL draft: Top defensive players on the boardAppeals court leaves temporary hold on New Jersey's county line primary ballot design in placeCedric Mullins hits 2Skeletal remains found at home in Illinois identified as those of woman missing since 2008